Living technical documentation
Technical
This section provides a living overview of the current mathematical, numerical and computational state of the Multiphysics project.
It documents the present project state. Formal dissertations, papers and releases remain independently citable scientific outputs.
Numerical formulation
Spatial methods
FDM — 1D
Current cell-centred finite-difference formulation, physical closures, semi-discrete system, time-integration relationship and verification evidence.
technical previewFEM — 1D
Current cell-centred P1 Galerkin formulation, including weak form, element assembly, mass lumping, half-cell completion, physical flux coupling and stability reference.
implemented / limited scopeFVM — 1D
The 1D finite-volume solver has an implemented-and-verified fixed-geometry/current-heating path. Geometry-changing welding stages remain unpromoted and are not presented as experimentally validated.
Implementations
Calculation environments
GNU Octave
An active sibling engine with the broadest current process-workflow coverage. MATLAB compatibility and high-level matrix/vector operations make it useful for numerical development, inspection and scientific prototyping.
active siblingC++
An active independent C++17 sibling engine used for same-method cross-engine verification, explicit compiled implementations and LLM-assisted development. Its current workflow coverage is narrower than Octave, but its architectural role is not secondary.
planned siblingJulia
A planned third independent engine for the same formulations, intended to broaden implementation redundancy and investigate numerical expressiveness and execution efficiency on selected workloads. No performance advantage is claimed before equivalent benchmarks exist.
Scientific tooling
Automation and evidence infrastructure
Verification
Evidence and validation boundaries
Verification framework
How analytical/reference cases, conservation, refinement, cross-method and cross-engine evidence fit together without being confused with experimental validation.
active / consolidatingNumerical verification
Current evidence includes conservation checks, analytical/reference cases, spatial refinement, stability references and controlled FDM/FEM/FVM studies.
future evidenceExperimental validation
Physical calibration and an independent validation case require traceable experimental observables and uncertainty treatment; the complete FBW model is not currently presented as experimentally validated.